Social Misconceptions: “Think Like A Man.”
Think like a man. A statement that has gained significant steam in the last few years. The eponymous movie that came out earlier this year, various books, articles, and other print media… All of these have aptly described a social revolution within the psyche of the lesser praised gender: women.
What are women? I mean this both scientifically and philosophically. Scientifically they possess the same sex chromosome (XX). They have internal sex organs. They have eggs and ovaries for the bearing of children. They have slightly different cognitive makeup (I admire psychology but I’d never purport to be any expert in the field). They have different social strata and rules of engagement. Different emotional impetuses. And so on.
Philosophically women represent the balance to men. They are the proverbial yin to our yang; their very existence fulfills the quintessence of cosmic balance. We are the seed of man, they are the fertile ground. I do subscribe to a Judeo-Christian school of thought, so I do see men as symbolic leaders. However, if we are to lead, it isn’t a perjorative “follower” role a woman occupies, but instead she is cultivator. The age old adage is “behind every great man is a great woman”. In a book by John Eldredge, Wild At Heart, he points out a term used in the Old Testament ezer kenegdo. The exact meaning of this term is a bit contested, but it has been narrowed down to: suitable helper and a more potent, more agreed upon meaning life saver.
Life saver. Women are our life savers. We are to symbolically lead, they are to symbolically “save lives”.
When you break down what it means to be a woman, you can clearly see that the chauvinism we’ve seen through the ages was NOT what was intended. Just like any gray area like race or sexual orientation, people have taken their personal interpretations and superimposed them over the annals of time. Women were never meant to be second class citizens, nor were they ever meant to be domesticated. A woman’s place is not in the kitchen, at home with the kids, or on her knees pleasing her “man”. A person is never property, therefore, the treatment as such directly violates our supposedly egalitarian logic. A woman’s place and purpose is to counterbalance her spouse. In the harmony generated between those two people, a natural synergy will come to fruition. Perhaps the man is an alpha male and he assumes a classic dominance over the household. Perhaps the woman is more dominant. Perhaps there is an equal presence. Whatever the agreement, the fact of the matter is one must agree with the other.
Just like two magnets generating a force over one another, men and women exchange energies. They are equal, but for millennia the male’s efforts were highlighted. What occurred was a rational reaction, easily explained by my IgR Theory. As cultures mixed and society increasingly liberalized, reactions formed over time. These in turn created “social eddies”, or small intracultural reactions which propagate a particular belief. These generational reactions explain certain things like why so many black men are absent in their children’s lives or why sex is suddenly wildly embraced.
I’m digressing like a muh fucca doe…
What the IgR Theory says in this circumstance is that women, in reaction to prior generations and traditions rebelled against the status quo and adopted many of the same tactics that had been used against them by men. There were the extremists like feminists who were much more militant and of course a myriad of others. As an equilibrium was formed and society went through the 80s, 90s, and 2000s, women truly began to see that the power was still wielded by the majority of men.
Thus bringing us to now. (I hope I didn’t lose you).
I don’t want to tread on any egg shells and if I piss any leftist feminists off, I apologize, but at the end of the day women have no business “thinking like men”, nor do men have any business “thinking like women”. These phrases are foolhardy to me because they strip each gender of the unique and blessed qualities inherent to each. But our dating world has become so marred with “games”. Womanizers and man-eaters. Distrust. Jumping through hoops. Commitment issues. Fear of intimacy. Daddy issues. Et al. Our world has further revealed its innards as being comprised of absolute confusion.
The result is now a free for all. The rules of engagement have shifted to more insidious, self absorbed mutations. One where a woman is not interested in cultivating and men are never in a position to lead. More men are now leeches and women are left to be breadwinners. Children are raised in single parent homes, where the woman is forced to teach a boy how to be a man, something that is just not possible. There is an unspoken, intangible exchange of substance between a father (or father figure) and his son, something that cannot be synthesized by a woman.
Men have fallen from their post and the reaction is that women have had to step up into roles they were never meant to have. So now dating and courtship have mutated irreversibly. Guards are miles high, expectations are live minefields.
I love women. I love them because they are the most magnificent of God’s creations. They hold the womb, the blessing to give life. I pray for my future wife often and my prayer is always that she loves me for me. That’s what really matters. However, I plan on being a man in whatever relationship I find myself in, therefore I want her to be comfortable being a woman. We cannot step on each others’ feet trying to ‘outgame’ one another. I cannot start “thinking like a woman” so that I “even the playing field”. Nor can she do vice versa.
We must find an agreeable common ground. That is both of our roles. To be completed by God and to growth together.
The yin cannot try to be the yang. Black cannot try to be white. Up cannot try to be down. Everything in the universe must have balance.
Man and woman must find and cherish that balance.
bryce
(The picture below describes gender roles perfectly. The man supports the structure, but the woman is necessary to balance it)